Big Sprinkler
Our sponsors

Advertise Here:
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Emerging Viability of Stallion Syndications | Main | Forage Insurance Policies – which is right for you? »
    Sunday
    May122013

    The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment”

    By John Alan Cohan, Attorney at Law

    For any business, long-term profit potential may hinge, in some measure, on efforts to reduce costs, getting better prices for goods and services, consolidating operations, layoffs, or efforts to promote efficiency.

    For many people in the horse or livestock business, the operations have a history of losses, but the expectation is that future operations will be profitable.  The IRS will want to see evidence that the taxpayer has taken steps to correct or abandon unprofitable strategies, and to demonstrates steps taken to improve operations. 

    Often, the IRS will argue that a profit motive ultimately depends on whether the taxpayer expects future earnings and appreciation to be sufficient to recoup accumulated losses of prior years.  The IRS will want to see a meaningful plan for recouping losses sustained in prior years.

    This seems inherently unfair.  Other businesses are not asked to demonstrate a plan to recoup past losses.  In some industries past losses have been so great that the companies might never really end up recouping them.

    According to Terrence D. Miller, CPA, of Miller and Miller Accountancy Corporation  in Fresno, California, “In my experience with audits, quite often an auditor will be obsessed with the cumulative losses and they fixate on it.  And the losses might not ever be recoupable.  Luckily there is a Tax Court case on the subject and usually when you show auditors this case they move on.”

    He is referring to Helmick v. Commissioner IRS, T.C. Memo 2009-220, which involved a horse breeding and boarding operation with losses for a period of 17 years.  The Tax Court held in favor of the taxpayers, and rejected the IRS “recoupment” argument.

    The court said that the IRS “seems to assume that the requisite profit motive as of any given year must involve an expectation that even all past losses will be recouped, so that the activity will have generated a net profit over its entire course.  This position distorts the notion of profit motive for purposes of section 183.”

    The court cited a hypothetical example:  “If a natural disaster caused the death of 90 percent of a rancher’s herd and resulted in a catastrophic loss that could never be recouped, but the rancher thereafter expected to generate an overall prospective profit by breeding and selling the remaining 10 percent of his herd on a foregoing basis, then he could not be said to lack a profit objective after the disaster merely because he would never recoup the prior loss.”

     

    The court pointed out – and this is very important – that the “recoupment” concept is forward looking.  That is, the profit objective is shown where the taxpayer expects that the activity will generate an overall profit between the year being audited and the time at which future profits are expected.

    To some extent, taxpayers often can explain a poor history of profits due to circumstances beyond their control, including personal issues, casualties, stillborn foals, and the negative effect of the recession on horse sales.  The implication is that the activity, in a given year, would have been profitable if these events had not occurred.

    Whether an activity producing losses is a business or a hobby is a question that has generated substantial litigation in U.S. Tax Court.  If faced with an audit of horse or livestock activities, it can be frustrating when confronted with an IRS auditor who wheels out the “recoupment” argument.  Thankfully, there are Tax Court cases, such as that mentioned above, that provide a rational approach in determining whether the taxpayer has a bona fide profit motivation.

    [John Alan Cohan is a lawyer who has served the horse, livestock and farming industries since l98l.  He can be reached at: (3l0) 278-0203, by e-mail at johnalancohan@aol.com, or you can see more at his website: www.johnalancohan.com.]

     

    References (27)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Response: casio ca003
      grand seiko
    • Response
      Response: Source
      Very good Site, Keep up the useful job. thnx.
    • Response
      Response: Hollister
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News,Aquest article va ser escrit l'exacte No obstant això, si voleu veure els articles relacionats que es poden veure aquí la informació:Hollister,
    • Response
      How do i make firefox my main browser for windows live messenger?
    • Response
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      For many people in the charger or livestock business, the functions bear a history of losses, only the prospect is that future processs desire be profitable. The IRS pleasure scarcity to descry proof that the taxpayer has taken processs to true or maroon useless strategies, further to indicates proceedings taken to ...
    • Response
      The new strategy - is modernized old! Well, time will tell how!
    • Response
      Response: seo moscow
      go here for best info on {seo|продвижение сайта|ceo|
    • Response
      Response: Dierdre
      I found a great...
    • Response
      Response: seo lawrenceville
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: SEO Sydney
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: Knoxville SEO
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: xovilichter
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: D D Photographics
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: Leisha
      I found a great...
    • Response
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: seo norwalk
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: look at these guys
      The IRS’s misguided approach to “recoupment” - Expert Advice for your equine stable business - Equine Stable Business News
    • Response
      Response: Round Lake Beach
    • Response
      Response: argan oil for hair
      Many different business structures may be required to make less or more information public and may be bound to comply with different rules and regulations.
    • Response
      Response: gold site
      I found a great...
    • Response
      Response: superiorpappers
      Along with the process of basic formal education, to gain vocational or technical skills is also important for students. The acquired knowledge or education of students can be utilized in productive way when they would have maximum professional, technical and vocational skills.
    • Response
      How to fund 4 taxact.com returning user 19 it bank tax news.
    • Response
      The court said that the IRS "appears to accept that the imperative benefit thought process starting any given year must include a desire that even every single past misfortune will be recovered, so that the action will have created a net benefit over its whole course.

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>